🔗 Share this article

Europe experienced widespread relief on Monday, as the tension caused by the introduction of a new 28-point plan for achieving ceasefire appeared – briefly – to have been defused. A Washington representative spoke of "substantial progress" after Ukraine-US talks in Geneva. On Monday night, Moscow made its response: another massive barrage of aerial bombardment on Kyiv.

The Rhythm of Negotiation and Warfare

The chain of opposing developments captured the bleak nature of the current period. By day, political struggles are waged: optimistic declarations are issued from different nations. Significant resources is allocated on containing certain initiatives. By night, the Kremlin clearly shows the world that, for them, military action persists as the key method for achieving "peace".

Nighttime Reality

As military strikes progressed into the early hours of Tuesday, the immediate reality of Ukraine's vulnerability was exposed. Ukraine is capable of detecting rocket firings from Russian territory, a capability afforded by up-to-date information. From observation points, military aircraft that had been dispatched to intercept incoming guided weapons streaked across the sky – modern combat jets provided to Ukraine by NATO members.

Soon thereafter, Kyiv's anti-aircraft weapons activated: defensive missiles targeted at a hostile projectile. This was a sophisticated defense system at work, probably delivered by allied countries. Every deployment shakes the surroundings, shaking the windows. The brief panic quickly gives way to resigned acknowledgment: maybe the hostile projectile won't hit its mark this time, preventing destruction from ruin and another blackout.

Continuous Dangers

Not long after, a heavy machine gun fired at a aerial vehicle in the vicinity, part of a defensive team – probably imported technology. Unfortunately, the projectiles didn't strike the opposing UAV – it pressed on overhead toward its target.

Intermittently, this persisted until dawn. Kyiv awoke to the morning news: several casualties, devastation and infrastructure problems in numerous residences as a result of the night's assault. As always, everyone still continued their routines – experiencing conflict. But those 24 hours demonstrated Ukraine's critical military reliance on Western support – a dependence that neighboring countries are demonstrably unable to substitute in the short term.

Failed Diplomacy

The detailed framework from Washington sparked intense emotion, controversy and profound anxiety – and briefly redirected concern from Ukraine's most significant graft case in years. Yet, we have witnessed similar scenarios, after earlier high-level meetings and international summits.

Every new proposal from American administration follows the identical sequence: a negotiation push against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with allied governments, manages to fend off. They stabilise the situation but never actually secure success. This cycle will, undoubtedly, endure.

Political Considerations

It is tempting to accuse certain parties of consistently pushing Kremlin's demands. But that does not seem to be the entire situation. Washington functions according to a premise familiar among experienced diplomats: you cannot secure via talks what you have been unable to protect through force. The White House presumes that it is unrealistic to force Russia to abandon the territory that it already controls in Ukraine's south or east.

The challenge is that while accepting these circumstances, US leadership does minimal to discourage Russia, through statements or actions, from assuming that the situation will not evolve additionally in its favour in the coming year.

Divergent Views

Therefore, the Kremlin is confident that time is on his side – that Ukraine and its supporters are nearing depletion. Their reason to accept conditions that does not give them the largest achievable advantage is virtually nonexistent. There may be many attempts to stop fighting, but they will persist as long as Russia's government remains highly assured in the conclusion.

On the contrary, Ukraine's government believes that Ukraine can still persist, slowly losing lives and land but preventing a complete military breakdown until situations evolve in its advantage.

Current Realities

Objectively, there are no genuine requirements for a armistice. Now, individual motivations are becoming relevant: personal goals to broker a ceasefire and achieve global acclaim, and the government's dual difficulties – on one hand, not to distance important partners, and on the other, to mobilize citizens around the country's interests against any initiative Kyiv finds unworkable, so that their attention does not move to domestic problems. And although their task will now be significantly challenging after latest incidents, it remains highly unlikely that this will modify their basic position.

These opposing factors are driving the talks.

Summary and Prospects

It took a mere seven days to kill the proposed articles of the latest plan. Assertive and inconsistent approach of the matter by American leadership, opposition by Ukraine and the other European countries, along with soothing efforts of diplomats, and finally, latest revelations, all achieved their purpose.

While new initiatives based on previous concepts are forthcoming, Kyiv, London and other Western governments should reach an essential realization: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to fend off political attacks from Washington that are based on Russian demands and reflect particular unwillingness to modify developments, if they remain united and enhance their military capacity at a much faster pace. If they do, neither external pressure nor military threats will be able to break them. In the meantime, Ukraine's ability to counter nocturnal attacks will, for the predictable period, mainly require sustained allied backing.